Oz Isuzu Forums
General Boards => Off Topic => Topic started by: Carlin1983 on Oct 17, 2015, 06:29:26 PM
-
Thought some people may be interested
http://www.caradvice.com.au/388419/ute-comparison-ford-ranger-v-holden-colorado-v-isuzu-d-max-v-mazda-bt-50-v-mitsubishi-triton-v-nissan-navara-v-toyota-hilux-v-volkswagen-amarok-2/
-
Seems the scoring doesn't match the impressions in that the judges have.
How can the dmax be second last in engine and drive train how good it was?
Heck they rated dmax down for not having Hill decent control when it has the best low range and engine breaking...that's worth more in the off road stakes then any electronic gadgetry.
Also i tested the Colorado 7 when i was looking to buying and there is no way was Mu-x is as quick to 100 as it I assume the same for the dmax...
I know i sound like someone with brand bias but that really is a rubbish review.
-
Who are the judges, some desk jockey's !!!! hahahha probably.
I drove most of the dual cabs before i bought a Dmax.
The Dmax suited more better than the others. (my opinion).
Dave
-
One of the big reasons that we chose the D-Max was due to the amount of room in the rear, they stated that the VW Amarok had more room in the rear than the D-Max, I find this a little hard to believe!